Adams, Z., Osman, M., Bechlivanidis, C., & Meder, B. (2023). (Why) is misinformation a problem? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6), 1436–1463. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221141344
Allen, J., Watts, D. J., & Rand, D. G. (2024). Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook. Science, 384(6699), Article eadk3451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk3451
Altay, S., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2023). News can help! The impact of news media and digital platforms on awareness of and belief in misinformation. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(2), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221148981
Arechar, A. A., Allen, J., Berinsky, A. J., Cole, R., Epstein, Z., Garimella, K., Gully, A., Lu, J. G., Ross, R. M., Stagnaro, M. N., Zhang, Y., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2023). Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9), 1502–1513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6
Barua, Z., Barua, S., Aktar, S., Kabir, N., & Li, M. (2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 8, Article 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119
Best, V., Decker, F., Fischer, S., & Küppers, A. (2023). Demokratievertrauen in Krisenzeiten: Wie blicken die Menschen in Deutschland auf Politik, Institutionen und Gesellschaft? [Trust in democracy in crisis: How do people in Germany view politics, institutions and society?]. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. http://www.fes.de/studie-vertrauen-in-demokratie
Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101832
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(225), 225–225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
Buuren, S. van, & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
Chen, M., Yu, W., & Liu, K. (2023). A meta-analysis of third-person perception related to distorted information: Synthesizing the effect, antecedents, and consequences. Information Processing & Management, 60(5), Article 103425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103425
Clifford, S., Kim, Y., & Sullivan, B. W. (2019). An improved question format for measuring conspiracy beliefs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(4), 690–722. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz049
Cologna, V., Mede, N. G., Berger, S., Besley, J., Brick, C., Joubert, M., Maibach, E. W., Mihelj, S., Oreskes, N., Schäfer, M. S., van der Linden, S., Abdul Aziz, N. I., Abdulsalam, S., Shamsi, N. A., Aczel, B., Adinugroho, I., Alabrese, E., Aldoh, A., Alfano, M., … Zwaan, R. A. (2025). Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(4), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
De Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2021). Who is responsible for disinformation? European approaches to social platforms’ accountability in the post-truth era. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(6), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221989784
De León, E., Makhortykh, M., & Adam, S. (2024). Hyperpartisan, alternative, and conspiracy media users: An anti-establishment portrait. Political Communication, 41(6), 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2325426
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2023). What are conspiracy theories? A definitional approach to their correlates, consequences, and communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T. S., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Dyrendal, A., Kennair, L. E. O., & Bendixen, M. (2021). Predictors of belief in conspiracy theory: The role of individual differences in schizotypal traits, paranormal beliefs, social dominance orientation, right wing authoritarianism and conspiracy mentality. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, Article 110645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110645
Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Stoler, J. (2020). The different forms of COVID-19 misinformation and their consequences. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-48
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). (2024). ESS11—Integrated file, edition 1.0 [Dataset]. Sikt – Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.21338/ESS11E01_0
Garrett, R. K., & Weeks, B. E. (2017). Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation. PLOS ONE, 12(9), Article e0184733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184733
Hölig, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2020). Reuters Institute digital news report 2020—Ergebnisse für Deutschland. SSOAR. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.71725
Hong, M., Steedle, J. T., & Cheng, Y. (2020). Methods of detecting insufficient effort responding: Comparisons and practical recommendations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(2), 312–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419865316
Hornsey, M. J., Bierwiaczonek, K., Sassenberg, K., & Douglas, K. M. (2022). Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00133-0
Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un–)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O., António, J. H. C., Babinska, M., Bangerter, A., Bilewicz, M., Blanuša, N., Bovan, K., Bužarovska, R., Cichocka, A., Delouvée, S., Douglas, K. M., Dyrendal, A., Etienne, T., Gjoneska, B., Graf, S., Gualda, E., Hirschberger, G., … Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2022). Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
Landrum, A. R., & Olshansky, A. (2019). The role of conspiracy mentality in denial of science and susceptibility to viral deception about science. Politics and the Life Sciences, 38(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2019.9
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10/gdkxfw
Li, J. (2023). Not all skepticism is “healthy” skepticism: Theorizing accuracy- and identity-motivated skepticism toward social media misinformation. New Media & Society, 27(1), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231179941
Lobato, E., Mendoza, J., Sims, V., & Chin, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population: Relationship between unwarranted beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
Mahl, D., Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2021). From “NASA lies” to “reptilian eyes”: Mapping communication about 10 conspiracy theories, their communities, and main propagators on twitter. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211017482
Mari, S., Gil De Zúñiga, H., Suerdem, A., Hanke, K., Brown, G., Vilar, R., Boer, D., & Bilewicz, M. (2022). Conspiracy theories and institutional trust: Examining the role of uncertainty avoidance and active social media use. Political Psychology, 43(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12754
Meirick, P. (2023). News sources, partisanship, and political knowledge in COVID-19 beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231164047
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust: conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-p6es-hb13
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Digital news report 2018. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/digital-news-report-2018.pdf
Newton, C., Feeney, J., & Pennycook, G. (2023). On the disposition to think analytically: Four distinct intuitive-analytic thinking styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(6), 906–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231154886
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Peters, M. A. (2021). On the epistemology of conspiracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(14), 1413–1417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1741331
Pratto, F., Çidam, A., Stewart, A. L., Zeineddine, F. B., Aranda, M., Aiello, A., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Cohrs, J. C., Durrheim, K., Eicher, V., Foels, R., Górska, P., Lee, I.-C., Licata, L., Liu, J. H., Li, L., Meyer, I., Morselli, D., … Henkel, K. E. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663
Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Herzog, S. M., Geers, M., Kurvers, R., Sultan, M., & van der Linden, S. (2022). Susceptibility to misinformation is consistent across question framings and response modes and better explained by myside bias and partisanship than analytical thinking. Judgment and Decision Making, 17(3), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003570
Schäfer, M. S., Mahl, D., Füchslin, Tobias, Metag, J., & Zeng, J. (2022). From hype cynics to extreme believers: Typologizing the Swiss population’s COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs, their corresponding information behavior, and social media use. International Journal of Communication, 16, 2885–2910. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18863
Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Frischlich, L. (2024). Truth, fake news, and conspiracy theories. In A. Pinchevski, P. M. Buzzanell, & J. Hannan (Eds.), The handbook of communication ethics (2nd ed., pp. 304–319). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003274506-25
Schwaiger, L. (2022). Gegen die Öffentlichkeit: Alternative Nachrichtenmedien im deutschsprachigen Raum [Against the public: alternative news media in the German-speaking world] (Vol. 46). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839461211
Stubenvoll, M. (2022). Investigating the heterogeneity of misperceptions: A latent profile analysis of COVID-19 beliefs and their consequences for information-seeking. Science Communication, 44(6), 759–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221142304
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2017). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10/gdgzp5
van der Linden, S. (2022). Misinformation: Susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public. Nature Medicine, 28(3), 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6
van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12681
van Erkel, P. F. A., van Aelst, P., De Vreese, C. H., Hopmann, D. N., Matthes, J., Stanyer, J., & Corbu, N. (2024). When are fact-checks effective? An experimental study on the inclusion of the misinformation source and the source of fact-checks in 16 European countries. Mass Communication and Society, 27(5), 851–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2024.2321542
Vliegenthart, R., Stromback, J., Boomgaarden, H., Broda, E., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y., & Van Remoortere, A. (2024). Taking political alternative media into account: Investigating the linkage between media repertoires and (mis)perceptions. Mass Communication and Society, 27(5), 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2251444
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c
Weeks, B. E., Menchen-Trevino, E., Calabrese, C., Casas, A., & Wojcieszak, M. (2023). Partisan media, untrustworthy news sites, and political misperceptions. New Media & Society, 25(10), 2644–2662. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211033300
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
Wu, Y., Kuru, O., Campbell, S. W., & Baruh, L. (2023). Explaining health misinformation belief through news, social, and alternative health media use: The moderating roles of need for cognition and faith in intuition. Health Communication, 38(7), 1416–1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2010891
Zeng, J. (2021). Theoretical typology of deceptive content (conspiracy theories). DOCA. https://doi.org/10.34778/5g
Zhou, A., Liu, W., & Yang, A. (2024). Politicization of science in COVID-19 vaccine communication: Comparing US politicians, medical experts, and government agencies. Political Communication, 41(4), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2201184
Ziegele, M., Resing, M., Frehmann, K., Jackob, N., Jakobs, I., Quiring, O., Schemer, C., Schultz, T., & Viehmann, C. (2022). Deprived, radical, alternatively informed: Factors associated with people’s belief in Covid-19 related conspiracy theories and their vaccination intentions in Germany. European Journal of Health Communication, 3(2), 97–130. https://doi.org/10.47368/ejhc.2022.205
