Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

The Fight for a Free Press Also Turns 250

June 24, 2026

D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge to Trump Administration Expedited Removal Policy (Is an En Banc Petition to Follow?)

June 24, 2026

Polish president vetoes crypto bill for third time ahead of MiCA deadline

June 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TheOthernews
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
TheOthernews
Home»Politics & Policy»Israel and Iran exchange first military strikes since April
Politics & Policy

Israel and Iran exchange first military strikes since April

nickBy nickJune 8, 2026No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Israel and Iran exchange first strikes since April: For the last two months, the ceasefire between Israel and Iran had mostly held. Until this weekend, when it quickly unraveled. Now Iran is indicating its military campaign is over for now and that it’s ready to deescalate once again. (Who knows how true that is, of course.)

“Iran fired waves of ballistic missiles at Israel on Sunday night in retaliation for an Israeli strike near the Lebanese capital, Beirut, against its ally Hezbollah,” reports The New York Times. “The Israeli military said on Monday morning that it had launched two waves of airstrikes across Iran, including against the country’s largest petrochemical complex, prompting further Iranian missile attacks on central Israel.”

The fact that Iran started striking Israel because of Israel’s actions against Hezbollah—the terrorist group that has been firing on Israel from southern Lebanon since October 2023, in what has been termed the “Gaza Support War”—is of great significance; it shows a shift in how Iran is thinking about defense of its allies

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day’s news every morning.

“This is the first time in decades that a regional power has the means, capacity, and willingness to put hard power against Israeli military maneuvers or aggression against a third party,” writes Iran scholar Trita Parsi on his Substack. The full post characterizes Israel’s actions as involving “genocide,” a characterization with which I disagree, for reasons David Bernstein outlines here. But Parsi’s evaluation of the changing stakes is correct: Iran’s newfound willingness to strike Israel due to Israel’s strikes on Hezbollah signals that U.S. support of Israel may become costlier. It makes sense that President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been exchanging tense words (and that Trump has been urging Bibi to hold off on attacking Iran, allowing a little more time for diplomacy).

The magnitude of what just happened may take some time to sink in.

This is the first time Iran has struck Israel after Israel struck another country’s territory (that is, not Iran).

This means that the battle lines have been moved.

Iran’s deterrence had already been restored… pic.twitter.com/KHpNjBTh97

— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) June 7, 2026

If Israel strikes southern Lebanon again, the Iranian military warned, “much harsher and more crushing actions than before will be on the way.” (But does this means it’s open season for Hezbollah, and they can just strike Israel with no consequences?) Tehran also said “it will target all oil and gas facilities linked to Israel, the US and their allies in the region if attacks on its own energy infrastructure continue” per Bloomberg and Fars, the Persian news service.

Where are the votes? Why exactly is it taking so damn long to count the votes in L.A.’s mayoral primary?

No winner has been determined yet, but Spencer Pratt—who had previously been in second place, behind incumbent mayor Karen Bass—is now trailing behind in third, after this most recent vote dump. Being third place behind Nithya Raman would mean Pratt does not advance to the primary, which would mean voters get the choice between basically two flavors of the same.

Me trying to figure out how votes get counted in LA pic.twitter.com/cXsbXNsY5C

— Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) June 7, 2026

The Associated Press notes that only 80 percent of votes have been counted, so we don’t really know the full outcome yet. And The New York Times reports that “late returns have trended heavily in favor of the liberals who make up an overwhelming majority of the city’s electorate.” Plenty of people on the right have implied or outright alleged that that reflects election integrity problems:

Spencer Pratt was doing this well because he was calling out a crooked and flawed system. If this is how they think they’re going to stop him, buckle up. They’re going to unleash something much bigger.

— Bethany S. Mandel (@bethanyshondark) June 7, 2026

No credible evidence of that has emerged. If that changes, I’ll note it.

Even though he’s a reality TV star with no governing experience, I can imagine Pratt being a breath of fresh air. “When it’s other people’s money for other people’s stuff, neither cost nor quality matters,” he said in a campaign ad, succinctly summarizing the problem with L.A.’s governance. (Also kind of a Milton Friedman point, but if any politician wants to coopt it, I’ll take it.) It’s kind of beautiful how much sheer rage he feels for the governing overlords whom he holds responsible for his home burning in the Palisades fire. It would be disappointing if Pratt didn’t get to advance, mostly because Raman doesn’t seem to present much opportunity for contrast from Bass.


Scenes from New York: Six people were injured in a stabbing at Penn Station last night. “He was just screaming, waving his head around,” one witness told CBS of the suspect. “I’ve seen him once, but I didn’t think he was capable of doing anything.” CNN described him as possibly “unhoused.” (Their euphemism, not mine.)

It’s almost like letting crazy people take up semi-permanent residence in the subway tunnels does both them and others a disservice.


QUICK HITS

  • “For decades, oil traders, executives and analysts warned that closing the Strait of Hormuz would be a global economic catastrophe,” reports Bloomberg. “It’s now been more than three months since the waterway was effectively blocked, creating the worst supply shock in modern history. But a slew of workarounds is keeping crude oil below $100 a barrel, defying many of the industry’s grimmest forecasts for prices as high as $200. A combination of record US exports, a sharp and unexpected slowdown in Chinese demand and a steady trickle of crude still finding its way through the strait has helped absorb much of the shock from the loss of more than 10 million barrels a day of Middle Eastern supply.”
  • “Local police received a call on May 27 claiming to have heard gunshots at Justice [Amy Coney] Barrett’s residence,” notes the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal. “The call was a fake emergency meant to send police to swarm the home of the Justice and her family…the latest in a pattern of harassment of Justices’ families aimed at intimidation or worse.”
  • Michelle Goldberg on “Why Everyone Wants Jon Ossoff to Run for President.” (Is this really what “everyone” wants? News to me.)
  • Whole Foods comes to Bushwick, Brooklyn…and people flip out:

one good question to ask when people say stuff like this is: in what specific way are the ~45% of bushwick residents who make below $80k harmed by the presence of a whole foods? https://t.co/qu5boWIEv9

— just matt (@questionableway) June 7, 2026





Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

New York Primary Results Show Democrats' Far-Left Pivot

June 24, 2026

Capping credit card fees threatens to hurt consumers and small businesses

June 24, 2026

Iran Conflict Will Likely Never Add Up for Americans or the World

June 24, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The Fight for a Free Press Also Turns 250

Media Bias June 24, 2026

Long before a single shot was fired at Lexington or Concord, a revolution was already…

D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge to Trump Administration Expedited Removal Policy (Is an En Banc Petition to Follow?)

June 24, 2026

Polish president vetoes crypto bill for third time ahead of MiCA deadline

June 24, 2026

Andy Burnham Has a Story. He Must Also Have a Plan

June 24, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.