Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

U.S. Treasury proposes demands that stablecoin firms be set to police bad transactions

April 16, 2026

Why Leftist Economics Can't Work. Mathematically

April 16, 2026

Why we have a duty to disobey unjust commands

April 16, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TheOthernews
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
TheOthernews
Home»Truth or Scare»Finding Skeptic Con-Man in the Epstein Files, Part 2.
Truth or Scare

Finding Skeptic Con-Man in the Epstein Files, Part 2.

nickBy nickApril 11, 2026No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


 

(Continued from Part 1)

Finding Skeptic Con-Man in the Epstein Files, Part 2.

Seckel asks Epstein for a “secured credit” loan of $8 million (!). Epstein seems to be willing to offer 6 million.

To: Al seckel
From: Jeevacation@gmail.com
Sent: Tue 12/7/2010 6:52:54 PM
Subject: Re: Question
What collateral is the issue
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhonc

On Dec 7, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Al seckel vrotc:
Can we make it 8 million in secured credit? Just easier. What would be
your loan rate?

From: Jeevacation  To: Al seckel a
Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 10:38:26 AM
Subject: Re: Question
6 million
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone 

On Dcc 7, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Al seckel wrote:
Serious question for an opportunity:
For a 3.5 mil loan for one year…
How much actual and real secured collateral would you need (amount of
value)?
What would be your loan rate?
Is this possible?
This is actually a real question.
Appreciatively,
Al

What is the context of this unusual negotiation?
—————————————————————————————————————————–

          From: Jeffrey Epstein <“jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Al seckel < >
Sent: Tue, June 15, 2010 8:37:08 PM
Subject: Re: sunday guests
always
On The, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Al seckel <
Sean Carroll, Caltech physicist
http://en.wikipedia.orgiwiki/Sean M. Carroll
http://mposterousuniverse.com/self.html
> wrote:
Joe Kirchvink, Caltech geology professor, friend since 1982. fun, smart, wacky.
http://www.gps.caltech.edu/%7Ejkirschvink/
http://www.gps.caltech.edu/%7Ejkirschvink/PEbio I .htm 

On Apr 17, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Al seckel wrote:
Jeff,
Good to talk to you this morning on this subject, as it is one I am entirely comfortable
with. 😉
The list I sent you yesterday has the criteria of thinkers, out of the box. These are amongst
the very brightest people that I know, where I enjoy listening to them, and they
say insightful things along with a deep understanding of the subject matter.
Intellectual judgment along with intellectual ability. The two don’t always go
hand-in-hand. This is also a list of people who have a certain type of intelligence,
but may not necessarily have social intelligence, i.e, they are a bit awkward.
Jay is incredibly skilled socially compared to some of the people on this list. Just fyi. I
personally am not bothered by social awkwardness, but this is your thing, and
you would like a good mix, and that is understandable. Criteria will just be
different then.
You brought up Jay. This is a good example. Jay does listen, and then tends to offer up his
own views. I very much enjoy interacting with Jay, and he is a close friend, and
although I may not always agree with him, he does always offer up ideas that are
interesting and worth thinking about. That’s why I put him on the list. He has a
certain way he maps the world and he is also very well read and informed. This is
not an argument about Jay, just why I put him on the list. I would also put
Nathan in the same category as Jay. Doesn’t listen much, pontificates, don’t
always agree with what he says, but he tends to say things that are provocative
and interesting. He has an interesting way of mapping the world too, and is well
read and informed. I enjoy bantering with both of them, and count them as real
friends that I have known and hung out with for many years.
Some of the names listed are titans of intellectual ego. Steven Wolfram being amongst the
worst of them. Others are very shy and socially and fashion awkward, but are
amongst the very brightest and informed that I know, and will run intellectual
circles around some of the names on this list.
I very much like the idea of your asking people on this list to contribute names of the ten
“brightest” people that they know. This list would provide an excellent set of
references.
Please note, that although I have a diversity of thinkers, I have distinctly avoided people
who map the world in a magical way, and would encourage us to avoid “magical
thinkers.

From: Jeevacation
To: Al seckel
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:16:16 AM
Subject: Re: Re:
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2009, at 6:33 PM, Al secke otc:
Anyone you don’t know on an immediate list, ask me or google
them. All are good friends of mine for years, but these very high end
circles travel together, so you should be very familiar with almost all
of them. And, a few that you don’t know, are off the charts, and in
some respects smarter than the ones that are familiar… 😉 They just
didn’t seek the limelight. I have marked these people with an
asterisk. Not everyone on this list is a scientist.
There is no order to this list (this is a cross-section off the top of my head). I can
think of more names if I put my mind to it, but lets start here:
I am happy to discuss anyone here
Nathan Mhyrvoid  *Catherine Mohr  *Jay Walker
Christof Koch  *Terry Sejnowski  Danny Hillis
*Bran Ferren  Vilamur Ramachandran  Lisa Randall
Frances Arnold  Jesse Dylan  Larry Page Elon Musk
Stephen Wolfram  Steve Juvertson  *Pablo Ho
Jaron Lanier  Craig Venter  paul Kirkaas  Yossi Vardi
*Eric Mjolsness  *Mike Douglas  Dean Kamen
*Shelly Glashow  *Derrick Ashong  James Cameron
*Ronald Crowley  *Jeffrey Lehman  Christine Maxwell
*Brock Pierce  *Rich Roberts  *Lee Stein  *Gerry Sussman
*John Conway  Dan Dubno (just because he is very interesting)

 From: Jeffrey Epstein < jeevacation@gmail.com>To: Al seckel

Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:56:34 PM
Subject: Re:
of course
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Al seckel wrote:
Ah, you have actually asked my specialty. Seriously. Ok, different
disciplines and business too?
From: Jeffrey it m>
To: Al seckel
Sent: Thu y„ : : PM
Subject
could you give me a list of who you think would enjoy a get together in florida„
smart , out of the box types


—————————————————————————————————————————- 

Wow, look at this…Epstein is suing two individuals – SCOTT ROTHSTEIN and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and goes to great lengths to prevent Al Seckel from giving a deposition on the case! 
(Edwards is an author who wrote Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and several other books like this.)

Apparently Edwards has subpoenaed Seckel to give a deposition, and Epstein is desperately fighting against this! What
is Epstein afraid that Seckel will say in a deposition, to file pages
and pages of high-priced lawyers’ citations and arguments to prevent
Seckel’s deposition from taking place????

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO OUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
TO PREVENT DEPOSITION OF ALFRED SECKEL 
Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein moves the Court, pursuant to Rule 1.280 and Rule 1.410, Florida
Rules of Civil Procedure, for entry of a protective order and an order quashing a subpoena
commanding non-party Alfred Seckel to appear for deposition in Los Angeles, California on
May 23, 2011, which subpoena Defendant Bradley J. Edwards (“Edwards”) has noticed over the
Plaintiffs objection. The grounds for this Motion are:
1. On or about April 7, 2011, counsel to Edwards noticed the deposition of Mr.
Seckel, despite the fact that counsel to Edwards was advised by Plaintiffs counsel that Mr.
Seckel has no knowledge of any issue in this case and is barely known to the Plaintiff at all. A
copy of the Notice and Subpoena is attached as Exhibit A. 
2. The Plaintiff seeks an order quashing the subpoena and entry of a protective order
to prevent the taking of this deposition indefinitely because Mr. Seckel has no relevant
information about this case and to allow the deposition would effectively condone harassment

 What follows are a half-dozen pages of legalese. This is beyond weird!!

  https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01103276.pdf



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

News Briefs 15-04-2026

April 15, 2026

Bad UFOs: Skepticism, UFOs, and The Universe: “Transients” in Palomar Sky Survey

April 14, 2026

Bad UFOs: Skepticism, UFOs, and The Universe: UFOs Blitz Mexico!

April 12, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

U.S. Treasury proposes demands that stablecoin firms be set to police bad transactions

Conspiracy Theories April 16, 2026

The U.S. is pitching new rules for stablecoin issuers to treat them like every other…

Why Leftist Economics Can't Work. Mathematically

April 16, 2026

Why we have a duty to disobey unjust commands

April 16, 2026

Kim Oversees Test of New Engine for North Korean ICBM

April 16, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.