Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

America, My Love, Just Two Cheers for Your Birthday

April 16, 2026

Cultural Problems Behind Falling Fertility Rate

April 16, 2026

Mass Destruction in Southern Lebanon as Israeli Forces Use ‘Gaza Tactics,’ Level Villages

April 16, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TheOthernews
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
TheOthernews
Home»Investigative Reports»An Opening for a Latin American United Front Against Corporate Lawfare
Investigative Reports

An Opening for a Latin American United Front Against Corporate Lawfare

nickBy nickApril 16, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


If Sheinbaum decides to finally take a stand, she would have important allies.

On March 25, Colombian President Gustavo Petro announced that his country, in the face of similar challenges to its sovereignty, will withdraw from the international arbitration system.

The Colombian leader’s historic decision comes after years of civil society advocacy. In 2023, more than 300 organizations called on the Colombian government to lead in the dismantling of a system that empowers transnational corporations, particularly in extractives industries, to destroy lives, ecosystems, and communities in which they operate.

A few weeks ago, 220 economic and legal experts, including renowned economists Joseph Stiglitz, Ha-Joon Chang, and Thomas Piketty, sent Petro a letter urging him to take this action. The letter also calls on him to use the upcoming First International Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels in Colombia to galvanize coordinated international action to reject the investor-state system.

Enrique Daza, a founder of the Colombian Network Against Free Trade, had also recently sharply criticized the Colombian government for conducting officials reviews of its trade agreements with the United States and the European Union but without these reviews leading to a clear break with the arbitration system. Daza, a tireless fighter for Colombian sovereignty and fair trade in the hemisphere, died just days before Petro’s March 28 announcement.

Brazil would also be a strong partner. Latin America’s largest economy has never signed a trade agreement or investment treaty that gives private foreign investors recourse to supranational arbitration bodies. Sheinbaum’s just-announced meetingwith Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva this summer offers an opportunity to move forward.

Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia account for between 65 percent and 70 percent of the total GDP of Latin America and the Caribbean. This represents a far more powerful potential economic bloc than the rightwing governments from the region that have allied with President Donald Trump in his new so-called “Shield of the Americas.” These conservative-led nations account for not more than a quarter of the region’s combined GDP.

In terms of population, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico are home to about 400 million inhabitants (60 percent of the region), while the “Shield” countries have just 160 million (24 percent).

No country can take on a system that benefits powerful transnational corporate interests alone. But together these three powerful nations could strike a strong blow to these anti-democratic rules and begin building an alternative that respects the rights of national governments to act in the interest of their own people and the environment.

This piece was originally published in La Jornada.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

Naïveté – CounterPunch.org

April 16, 2026

Victory Disease in Iran – CounterPunch.org

April 16, 2026

A Plea to Save Cuba

April 16, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

America, My Love, Just Two Cheers for Your Birthday

Alternative News April 16, 2026

My love affair with America has been a long one. It began when I was…

Cultural Problems Behind Falling Fertility Rate

April 16, 2026

Mass Destruction in Southern Lebanon as Israeli Forces Use ‘Gaza Tactics,’ Level Villages

April 16, 2026

Taliban Defeats Five American Presidents

April 16, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.