Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Lindsay Clancy Case Isn't Complicated

September 4, 2026

Flock Is Losing Dozens of Contracts as Controversy Grows

September 4, 2026

Trump 'Suffering From Success' on Border?

September 4, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Other News
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
The Other News
Home»Political Spin»Judging the Supreme Court’s Emergency Docket
Political Spin

Judging the Supreme Court’s Emergency Docket

nickBy nickApril 13, 2026No Comments1 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

[ad_1]

At last Friday’s University of Virginia Federalist Society Originalism Symposium on “Originalism and Article III,” I participated in a Rupe Debate with Professor Jed Shugerman on the resolution: “The Supreme Court’s deference to recent executive actions on the emergency docket is consistent with the separation of powers.”

Professor Shugerman and I had a fruitful and enjoyable exchange, even if he agreed with me on many points and we dove deep into the question of how the Supreme Court should have handled the stay applications in the various removal cases, such as Wilcox and Boyle. The video is below.

[ad_2]

Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

Nebraska lawsuit argues that school choice is a First Amendment issue

August 18, 2026

Second Circuit Joins Courts That Recognize First Amendment “Right to Record Law Enforcement Activity in Public”

August 17, 2026

Warsh Is Wise To Ditch the Dots

August 17, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

Lindsay Clancy Case Isn't Complicated

Media Bias September 4, 2026

[ad_1] Unfortunately for Americans, that individual is a child killer. [ad_2] Source link

Flock Is Losing Dozens of Contracts as Controversy Grows

September 4, 2026

Trump 'Suffering From Success' on Border?

September 4, 2026

Are Fewer Children the Future?

September 4, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.