[ad_1]
A very interesting video and transcript. Sai’s summary from the end (though of course it’s just a summary, and the analysis is elsewhere in the transcript and in Sai’s articles on the subject).
I think the founders wanted to create a strong executive—not all-powerful, but strong.
And they wanted someone in charge of law execution. I think that’s the principal function of the executive, not rulemaking and not acting as a substitute court.
And they had examples of plural executives in the states, and they eschewed them.
So I think the Court got it right….
I … think the country is better off having a president in charge of law execution rather than having a bunch of people independently doing it.
Having said that, we do have states where we have plural executives, and it’s not as if people think they’re dysfunctional.
But I think there are advantages to executive unity, particularly when it comes to law execution.
[ad_2]
Source link
