Joshua Scheer
Based on reporting by Theia Chatelle at The Intercept, the story of Kareem exposes the contradiction at the heart of Israel’s claim to be a safe haven for LGBTQ+ Palestinians.
For years, Israel’s defenders have pointed to LGBTQ+ rights as proof that the country stands apart from its neighbors — a modern democracy surrounded by intolerance. It has become one of the most durable talking points in Israel’s public relations arsenal: whatever criticisms may be leveled against occupation, apartheid accusations, settlement expansion, or military violence, Israel remains, we are told, a refuge for queer people.
The story of Kareem exposes how hollow that narrative can become when it collides with the realities of occupation.
After threats from his own family forced him to flee Ramallah, Kareem crossed into Israel believing he might finally find safety. Instead, according to reporting by The Intercept, he entered a bureaucratic maze where his survival depended on military permits, intelligence screenings, and a system that repeatedly pressured him to provide information about Palestinians in the occupied territories.
The contradiction could not be more striking.
Israel markets itself internationally as a sanctuary for LGBTQ+ Palestinians while maintaining a permit regime that leaves many of those same Palestinians trapped in legal limbo, vulnerable to deportation, homelessness, blackmail, and exploitation. The message is clear: your life may be worth protecting, but only on terms dictated by the occupying power.
Kareem’s experience reveals something deeper than a failure of asylum policy. It reveals how occupation permeates every aspect of Palestinian life, even for those attempting to escape persecution. Fleeing family violence did not free him from systems of control. It merely transferred him from one form of vulnerability to another.
According to lawyers and advocates interviewed by The Intercept, Palestinian asylum-seekers are routinely pressured to share information with Israeli authorities in exchange for permit approvals or protection from deportation. Their fear becomes leverage. Their desperation becomes a resource to be mined. Their isolation becomes an opportunity for intelligence gathering.
This is the dark side of what critics have long called “pinkwashing” — the use of LGBTQ+ rights as a public-relations shield behind which other forms of state violence and discrimination continue unchecked.
The Israeli government frequently points to Pride parades in Tel Aviv and legal protections for LGBTQ+ citizens as evidence of liberal values. Yet for Palestinians living under military occupation, rights are often conditional, temporary, and revocable. Kareem’s permit was stripped away based on dubious security allegations, forcing him into a legal battle simply to remain alive. His family’s threats followed him across the separation wall, while Israeli authorities questioned whether the danger he faced was even real.
The larger irony is devastating. Israel insists it cannot grant permanent status to Palestinians like Kareem because doing so could create precedents touching the broader Palestinian right of return. The result is a system where queer Palestinians may escape immediate danger but are denied any stable future. They exist in a perpetual state of uncertainty, renewing permits every few months while waiting for resettlement options that increasingly do not exist.
Kareem’s story is not simply about one young gay Palestinian caught between family persecution and state bureaucracy. It is about a political system that treats vulnerable human beings as security files first and people second.
The tragedy is that Kareem did find relative safety. He found shelter. He found distance from those who threatened his life. But he did not find freedom.
Instead, he discovered that in the machinery of occupation, even refuge can become another instrument of control.
Editor’s Note: At a moment when the once vaunted model of responsible journalism is overwhelmingly the play thing of self-serving billionaires and their corporate scribes, alternatives of integrity are desperately needed, and ScheerPost is one of them. Please support our independent journalism by contributing to our online donation platform, Network for Good, or send a check to our new PO Box. We can’t thank you enough, and promise to keep bringing you this kind of vital news.
You can also make a donation to our PayPal or subscribe to our Patreon.
Please share this story and help us grow our network!
