Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Videos of Media Interviews on the Birthright Citizenship Decision

June 30, 2026

How Trump Hijacked America's Birthday

June 30, 2026

The Fertility Crash Will Make the World a Small Town

June 30, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TheOthernews
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
TheOthernews
Home»Propaganda & Narrative»In Gift to Billionaires, Supreme Court Buys Vance’s Argument Against Post-Watergate Campaign Finance Rule
Propaganda & Narrative

In Gift to Billionaires, Supreme Court Buys Vance’s Argument Against Post-Watergate Campaign Finance Rule

nickBy nickJune 30, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Editor’s Note: While many are celebrating the Supreme Court’s narrow victory preserving birthright citizenship, it is important not to lose sight of the broader picture. This was only one case, and one constitutional protection. The same Court continues to issue decisions that expand corporate power, weaken voting rights, erode protections for workers and immigrants, and concentrate ever greater authority in the hands of the wealthy and politically powerful. Defending birthright citizenship was the constitutional minimum—not a reversal of the Court’s broader trajectory. As this Common Dreams article argues, the struggle to defend democracy and equal rights is far from over.

In Gift to Billionaires, Supreme Court Buys Vance’s Argument Against Post-Watergate Campaign Finance Rule

Jessica Corbett for Common Dreams

Just days after Vice President JD Vance suggested that if Watergate happened today, it would barely make the news, let alone end a presidency, the US Supreme Court’s right-wing supermajority on Tuesday embraced the Republican’s argument against a 1974 campaign finance rule that Congress passed in response to the seismic scandal.

Specifically, the court struck down restrictions on political parties coordinating campaign spending with candidates. The ruling is the result of a 2022 lawsuit filed by Vance, then a Republican Senate candidate in Ohio; Steve Chabot, then a GOP congressman from the same state; and the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) and its House counterpart.

The high court had previously upheld the rule in 2021, but as with the 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which opened the floodgates to unlimited campaign spending by corporations and ultrarich individuals via super political action committees (PACs), the majority cited the First Amendment to the US Constitution in its 6-3 decision in NRSC v. FEC. The three liberals dissented.

Michael Beckel, director of money in politics reform at the group Issue One, stressed that Tuesday’s decision opening up “a new avenue for wealthy donors and special interests to buy favor with political candidates” is part of “a string of disastrous campaign finance rulings from the Roberts Court that began with Citizens United and have left our political system awash in large contributions that most Americans could never dream of giving.”

Brett Edkins, managing director of policy and political affairs for the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, similarly declared that “the right-wing supermajority on the Supreme Court thinks Citizens United didn’t go far enough. Today they gave their blessing for billionaires to buy even more influence over the politicians who represent us.”

“Americans deserve a Supreme Court that upholds our fundamental freedoms—not one that consistently sides with billionaire donors and diminishes the power of everyday citizens in our democracy,” Edkins asserted, calling on Congress to add more members to the court once President Donald Trump finishes his second term in 2029.

“Congress should rein in this rogue court once Trump leaves office by enacting major reforms, including term limits, an enforceable code of ethics, and expanding the court with justices who will defend our democracy and our fundamental freedoms,” he said.

If you want to understand how the Supreme Court today further legalized corruption, watch this video – and pass it on. It’s all about the case. pic.twitter.com/AzCHAr7WTw

— David Sirota (@davidsirota) June 30, 2026

In the meantime, Americans will have to contend with the new ruling in the November midterms as well as the next presidential cycle in 2028.

Along with calling out a high court that yet again “twisted the First Amendment to help billionaires and corporations buy our elections and bend our government to their will,” Public Citizen democracy advocate Jon Golinger argued Tuesday that “we have to combat this outcome by increasing transparency so voters know who’s paying for election ads, empowering small donors and public matching funds, and passing the Democracy For All Amendment to empower Congress, the states, and the voters to put in place reasonable protections to guard against campaign finance corruption.”

The ruling came as Public Citizen released a report documenting the historic $517 million in corporate spending on the 2026 cycle so far—money that has largely gone to “industry-prioritizing super PACs” and the Trump-aligned MAGA Inc.

Democratic Party leaders, who hope to reclaim majorities in both chambers of Congress this November, also ripped the new ruling.

It’s important to understand that the Court is now just an arm of the oligarchy.

This decision strips the people of the right to limit the role of money in politics. It gives billionaires special rights to buy our elections. A precondition of oligarchy. https://t.co/diHF9gxBZ7

— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) June 30, 2026

In a joint statement, Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin, as well as Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), who lead the party’s campaign arms for each chamber, called it “a win for billionaire donors and special interests who want more influence over the GOP agenda and an invitation for corruption.”

“Republicans have failed the American people with a record that has ripped away healthcare and raised costs on families, and they know voters will hold them accountable in November—which is exactly why they are rewriting the rules in an effort to drown out the will of the voters by flooding elections with more money from their billionaire backers,” they said.

“Democrats are fighting back for the American people,” the trio added, “and in November, voters will reject Republicans’ toxic agenda and efforts to rig the system and weaken our democracy by electing a Democratic House and Senate majority.”

Editor’s Note: At a moment when the once vaunted model of responsible journalism is overwhelmingly the play thing of self-serving billionaires and their corporate scribes, alternatives of integrity are desperately needed, and ScheerPost is one of them. Please support our independent journalism by contributing to our online donation platform, Network for Good, or send a check to our new PO Box. We can’t thank you enough, and promise to keep bringing you this kind of vital news.

You can also make a donation to our PayPal or subscribe to our Patreon.

Please share this story and help us grow our network!




Post navigation





Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

Inside ‘Labour Together’s’ Campaign Against Jeremy Corbyn – Consortium News

June 30, 2026

Taking on the Rich Is Possible. Our Illinois Coalition Won a Tax on Tech Giants.

June 30, 2026

ICE Kidnapped My Husband on His Way to Buy Diapers for Our Infant Son

June 30, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

Videos of Media Interviews on the Birthright Citizenship Decision

Political Spin June 30, 2026

NA Today, I did two TV interviews about the Supreme Court’s ruling in the birthright…

How Trump Hijacked America's Birthday

June 30, 2026

The Fertility Crash Will Make the World a Small Town

June 30, 2026

Europe’s Moral Bankruptcy – Consortium News

June 30, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.