Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Chicago homeowner sues border cops for warrantless raid

July 30, 2026

Just 1 in 4 Americans Want Trump to Continue the War Against Iran

July 30, 2026

Police in schools focus more on vaping than violence

July 30, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TheOthernews
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
TheOthernews
Home»Double Speak»Professional and community-based fact-checking show different strengths, but neither performs strongly across trust, scalability, and impact
Double Speak

Professional and community-based fact-checking show different strengths, but neither performs strongly across trust, scalability, and impact

nickBy nickJuly 30, 2026No Comments8 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Allen, J., Arechar, A. A., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Scaling up fact-checking using the wisdom of crowds. Science Advances, 7(22), eabf4393. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4393

Allen, J., Martel, C., & Rand, D. G. (2022). Birds of a feather don’t fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter’s Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking program. In S. Barbosa, C. Lampe, C. Appert, D. A. Shamma, S. Drucker, J. Williamson, & K. Yatani (Eds.), CHI ’22: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502040

Allen, M. R., Desai, N., Namazi, A., et al. (2024). Characteristics of X (formerly Twitter) Community Notes addressing COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. JAMA, 331(19), 1670–1672. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.4800

Aruguete, N., Bachmann, I., Calvo, E., Valenzuela, S., & Ventura, T. (2025). Truth be told: How “true” and “false” labels influence user engagement with fact-checks. New Media & Society, 27(3), 1443–1464. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231193709

Aruguete, N., Batista, F., Calvo, E., Guizzo-Altube, M., Scartaschini, C., & Ventura, T. (2024). Framing fact-checks as a “confirmation” increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: A four-country study. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 3201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53337-0

Bartsch, A., Neuberger, C., Stark, B., Karnowski, V., Maurer, M., Pentzold, C., Quandt, T., Quiring, O., & Schemer, C. (2025). Epistemic authority in the digital public sphere: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Communication Theory, 35(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae020

Bashardoust, A., Feuerriegel, S., & Shrestha, Y. R. (2024). Comparing the willingness to share for human-generated vs. AI-generated fake news. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW2), Article 489. https://doi.org/10.1145/3687028

Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2017). Trust and distrust in online fact-checking services. Communications of the ACM, 60(9), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122803

Chuai, Y., Tian, H., Pröllochs, N., & Lenzini, G. (2024). Did the roll-out of Community Notes reduce engagement with misinformation on X/Twitter? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW2), Article 428. https://doi.org/10.1145/3686967

Cotter, K. (2021). “Shadowbanning is not a thing”: Black box gaslighting and the power to independently know and credibly critique algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 26(6), 1226–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994624

Drolsbach, C. P., & Pröllochs, N. (2022). Diffusion of community fact-checked misinformation on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), Article 428. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610058

Drolsbach, C. P., Solovev, K., & Pröllochs, N. (2024). Community Notes increase trust in fact-checking on social media. PNAS Nexus, 3(7), pgae217. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae217

Ejaz, W., Altay, S., & Ittefaq, M. (2025). How effective are fact-checks in Pakistan and who engages with them? Information, Communication & Society, 28(14), 2439-2461. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2445636

Flamini, D. (2019, July 3). Most Republicans don’t trust fact-checkers, and most Americans don’t trust the media. Poynter. https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/2019/most-republicans-dont-trust-fact-checkers-and-most-americans-dont-trust-the-media/

Godel, W., Sanderson, Z., Aslett, K., Nagler, J., Bonneau, R., Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2021). Moderating with the mob: Evaluating the efficacy of real-time crowdsourced fact-checking. Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i1.15

He, B., Hu, Y., Lee, Y.-C., Oh, S., Verma, G., & Kumar, S. (2025). A survey on the role of crowds in combating online misinformation: Annotators, evaluators, and creators. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 19(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3694980

Kuuse, S. F., Kangur, U., Chakraborty, R., & Sharma, R. (2025). Crowdsourced fact-checking or biased commentary? Analyzing political bias in Twitter’s Community Notes. In WWW ’25: Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025 (pp. 2661–2669). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3701716.3717533

Kyriakidou, M., Cushion, S., Hughes, C., & Morani, M. (2022). Questioning fact-checking in the fight against disinformation: An audience perspective. Journalism Studies, 23(15–16), 2123–2139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2097118

La Barbera, D., Maddalena, E., Soprano, M., Roitero, K., Demartini, G., Ceolin, D., Spina, D., & Mizzaro, S. (2024). Crowdsourced fact-checking: Does it actually work? Information Processing & Management, 61(5), Article 103792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103792

Lavilles, R. Q., Naga, J. F., Tinam-isan, M. A. C., Perez, J. E., & Palad, E. B. B. (2023). Information verification practices and perception of social media users on fact-checking services. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2023.11.1.1

Lee, S., Xiong, A., Seo, H., & Lee, D. (2023). “Fact-checking” fact checkers: A data-driven approach. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-126

Lewandowsky, S. (2025). Free speech, fact checking, and the right to accurate information. Science, 387(6632), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adv4632

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008

Liu, X., Qi, L., Wang, L., & Metzger, M. J. (2025). Checking the fact-checkers: The role of source type, perceived credibility, and individual differences in fact-checking effectiveness. Communication Research, 52(6), 719–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231206419

Meta. (2025, March). Testing begins for Community Notes on Facebook, Instagram and Threads. Meta Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2025/03/testing-begins-community-notes-facebook-instagram-threads/

Metzler, H., & Garcia, D. (2023). Social drivers and algorithmic mechanisms on digital media. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(5), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231185057

Nyhan, B. (2021). Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e1912440117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912440117

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A… & Moher, D. (2020). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Park, C. S. (2023). Why people rely on fact-checkers? Testing theses of “perceived severity of fake news” and “disappointment in news media.” Journalism Studies, 25(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2289878

Pigott, T. D., & Shepperd, S. (2013). Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(11), 1244–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.013

Pilarski, M., Solovev, K. O., & Pröllochs, N. (2024). Community Notes vs. Snopes: How the crowd selects fact-checking targets on social media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 18(1), 1262–1275. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31387

Porter, E., & Wood, T. J. (2021). The global effectiveness of fact-checking: Evidence from simultaneous experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(37), e2104235118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104235118

Pretus, C., Gil-Buitrago, H., Cisma, I., Hendricks, R. C., & Lizarazo-Villarreal, D. (2024). Scaling crowdsourcing interventions to combat partisan misinformation. Advances in Psychology, 2, e85592. https://doi.org/10.56296/aip00018

Primig, F. (2022). The influence of media trust and normative role expectations on the credibility of fact checkers. Journalism Practice, 18(5), 1137–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2080102

Pröllochs, N. (2022). Community-based fact-checking on Twitter’s Birdwatch platform. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 16(1), 794–805. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19335

Roozenbeek, J., Remshard, M., & Kyrychenko, Y. (2024). Beyond the headlines: On the efficacy and effectiveness of misinformation interventions. Advances in Psychology, 2, e24569. https://doi.org/10.56296/aip00019

Saeed, M., Traub, N., Nicolas, M., Demartini, G., & Papotti, P. (2022). Crowdsourced fact-checking at Twitter: How does the crowd compare with experts? In CIKM ’22: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (pp. 1736–1746). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511808.3557279

Schroeder, D. T., Cha, M., Baronchelli, A., Bostrom, N., Christakis, N. A., Garcia, D., Goldenberg, A., Kyrychenko, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., Lutz, N., Marcus, G., Menczer, F., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G., Schweitzer, F., Summerfield, C., Tang, A., Van Bavel, J., van der Linden, S., Song, D., & Kunst, J. R. (2026). How malicious AI swarms can threaten democracy. Science, 391(6783), 354–357. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adz1697

Seelam, A., Paul Choudhury, A., Liu, C., Goay, M., Bali, K., & Vashistha, A. (2024). “Fact-checks are for the Top 0.1%”: Examining reach, awareness, and relevance of fact-checking in rural India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637333

Swire-Thompson, B., Miklaucic, N., Wihbey, J. P., Lazer, D., & DeGutis, J. (2022). The backfire effect after correcting misinformation is strongly associated with reliability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(7), 1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001131

Tan, N. (2020). Electoral management of digital campaigns and disinformation in East and Southeast Asia. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 19(2), 214–239. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2019.0599

Zhao, A., & Naaman, M. (2023). Insights from a comparative study on the variety, velocity, veracity, and viability of crowdsourced and professional fact-checking services. Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v2i1.118

Zhou, Y., Hou, J., Gao, Y., & Chen, P.-Y. (2025). How does crowdsourced fact-checking approach tackling misinformation affect audience engagement? Evidence from Twitter’s Community Notes program. In T. X. Bui (Ed.), Proceedings of the 58th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 6554–6561). University of Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2025.783



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

Experts disagree on how to fight AI disinformation, but agree that health and politics need different solutions

July 29, 2026

“When politicians make claims, we are journalists”: Political fact-checking and social media partnerships

July 28, 2026

The future of fact-checking in the algorithmic society

July 28, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

Chicago homeowner sues border cops for warrantless raid

Politics & Policy July 30, 2026

Leo Feler, an American citizen and homeowner in Chicago, was away on a business trip…

Just 1 in 4 Americans Want Trump to Continue the War Against Iran

July 30, 2026

Police in schools focus more on vaping than violence

July 30, 2026

Trump Suggests Thune's Future as Senate Leader Is in Doubt

July 30, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.