Author: nick
[ad_1] For centuries, mainstream archaeologists have dismissed the idea that an advanced civilization existed long before modern times. Now, an independent researcher claims he has uncovered ‘paradigm-shifting evidence of a lost civilization’ that hid a sophisticated code through geometry, symbolism, and monument design across the globe to preserve its knowledge ahead of catastrophic events. Matthew LaCroix told Daily Mail the discovery, sparked by a recent find in Egypt, links symbols across continents and dates back 38,000 to 40,000 years. According to LaCroix, this civilization tracked cosmic cycles, anticipated global disasters, and embedded teachings about human origins, the structure of the…
[ad_1] You Have To Look Twice at This NYT Headline To Believe It [ad_2] Source link
[ad_1] Tony Lyons tells how The Real Anthony Fauci survived a media blackout and censorship to sell 1.4 million copies, and why censorship always backfires. [ad_2] Source link
[ad_1] Kit Klarenberg Substack Donald Trump entered the July 7th/8th NATO summit having recently condemned the alliance as a “paper tiger” over its collective failure to abet the calamitous Zionist-American war on Iran, repeatedly threatened to withdraw US forces from Europe, with reveries of Greenland’s annexation still abounding. He left boasting of the intense “love” and “unity” within NATO, while praising member states for their reaffirmed commitment to spending ever-increasingly vast sums on ‘defence’. Meanwhile, the Ukraine proxy war’s world-threatening continuation appears assured for potentially years to come. As such, the NATO summit signifies a significant triumph in Britain’s neverending battle to exploit the US Empire to further her own…
[ad_1] A short take [ad_2] Source link
[ad_1] The Pennsylvanian is an outlier in a party where what he calls the warped mutation of democratic socialism is rising. [ad_2] Source link
[ad_1] From Fifth Circuit Judge Don Willett, joined by Judges Carl Stewart, James Graves, Stephen Higginson, Dana Douglas, and Irma Carrillo Ramirez, dissenting on Thursday from denial of rehearing en banc: The Supreme Court has already called the constitutional issue presented here “undeniably important”: whether the First Amendment tolerates a negligent-protest theory that substitutes the mere foreseeability of a stranger’s violence for intent. After a decade of litigation, full discovery, and another appeal, every threshold obstacle is gone. At last, the question is cleanly presented…. Every obstacle that complicated Supreme Court review in 2020 is now gone. The state-law uncertainty…
[ad_1] Michael Shuman, The Main Street Journal. The United States has been on the precipice of a “nuclear renaissance” for four decades. And I can tell you right now, with confidence, that it will never happen. Why? Because nuclear power is getting more costly while solar alternatives are getting cheaper. By a lot. And the persistence—by politicians like Governor Kathy Hochul, by policymakers on both sides of the aisle, and even by smart analysts like Ezra Klein—to wish nuclear back into competitiveness suggests why we localists should always be skeptical of top-down theories of change. Basic facts: Over the last…
[ad_1] 8/1/1942: Military commissions conclude for eight nazi saboteurs. The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of these trials in Ex Parte Quirin. The Stone Court (1942)The post Today in Supreme Court History: August 1, 1942 appeared first on Reason.com. [ad_2] Source link
[ad_1] Foreign Policy in Focus Timothy Hopper ( Foreign Policy in Focus ) Amid renewed escalation between the United States and Iran, an unusually visible dispute has emerged within the U.S. government over the aims and limits of the confrontation. Recent remarks by Vice President J.D. Vance moved that divide from the margins to the center of Washington’s foreign-policy debate when he warned that some figures within the Israeli government had tried to influence American public opinion and prevent an agreement capable of ending the war. His position raises a fundamental question: Is war with Iran serving the American national interest, or is…