It has been clear throughout the last 30 months that what has been happening in Gaza will not stay in Gaza, writes Andy Worthington. Gaza is a template for a world of limitless slaughter and surveillance.
A displaced person with a disability walks over the rubble of houses in Jabalia camp, Gaza Strip, May 31, 2024. (Hussein Jaber /UNRWA /Wikimedia Commons/, CC BY-SA 3.0 igo)
By Andy Worthington
Andy Worthington.co.uk
For the last two and a half years, the State of Israel has unilaterally — and with jaw-dropping illegality — reimagined warfare as a religiously-mandated existential struggle against alleged “forces of darkness” in which there are no rules, and no sense of proportionality or restraint.
Everyone in the Gaza Strip — 2.3 million people at the start of this “conflict” — has been regarded as, in one way or another, “associated” with Hamas.
The administrative government of Gaza’s military wing, along with other armed factions, broke out of the “open-air prison” of Gaza on Oct. 7, 2023, killing hundreds of Israeli security personnel, and hundreds of civilians.
Completely supported by almost all the nations of the West, which approved the shamefully ill-defined notion that Israel had “the right to defend itself,” Israel has reinterpreted “self-defense” to mean genocide, inflicting such disproportionate destruction on Gaza that almost its entire built environment has been destroyed.
Over ten percent of its population — a quarter of a million people — have been killed or wounded.
As of today, the official death toll, as assessed by Gaza’s shattered Health Ministry, is 72,594, with 172,404 people injured, and with, of course, many of those injured suffering life-changing and in many cases life-threatening injuries.
Even since a ceasefire was declared six months ago, Israel has continued to directly kill and wound Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, breaking the ceasefire on thousands of occasions, leading to another 818 deaths, and 2,301 injuries.
On April 20, U.N. Women published an article, “Who are the women and girls behind Gaza war’s horrific casualty toll?,” pointing out that over half of those killed were women and girls — at least 22,000 women and 16,000 girls, proportions much higher than in previous conflicts in Gaza.
“Israel has reinterpreted ‘self-defense’ to mean genocide.”
As the article also explained, “Nearly 11,000 women and girls in Gaza have sustained injuries so severe they now face lifelong disabilities.” In addition, “Nearly one million women and girls have been displaced in Gaza, with many being forced into displacement an average of four times.
Access to water and food has been severely limited, with nearly 790,000 women and girls experiencing crisis-level or catastrophic levels of food insecurity.”
Nor must we forget the men and boys who make up the other 34,000 victims of Israel’s genocide, of whom at least 10,000 were children, while the majority of the men were also civilians.
Israel itself admitted, in documents released last year, and subsequently analyzed by Israel’s +972 Magazine and The Guardian, and which I wrote about here, that, by its own assessment, 83 percent of those killed in Gaza were civilians, having only been able to verify that 7,330 individuals had been combatants.
Moreover, numerous responsible analysts have also undertaken detailed research establishing that the true death toll is many times higher than the figure compiled by Gaza’s Health Ministry — perhaps, as I have discussed at various times over the last two years, anywhere between 150,000 and several hundred thousand.
These much higher figures rely, primarily, on assessments of the number of secondary deaths in addition to those resulting from direct military attacks — caused by the collapse of healthcare services, shortage of food and clean water, and the spread of diseases.
Israel’s Death Toll Climbs in Gaza, Despite Ceasefire
On every front, Israel has, over the last 30 months, maximised its efforts to create as many secondary deaths as possible.
It has done this through prolonged sieges on all supplies of food, water, fuel and medical supplies; through the deliberate destruction of Gaza’s hospitals and its entire healthcare sector; through the destruction of Gaza’s sewage systems, and, most recently, through a refusal to allow in any kind of machinery for clearance and reconstruction. This is most urgently needed for the mountains of garbage that have built up and that have become a significant health hazard.
As the poet and writer Omar Hamad reported on X ,
“Gaza is witnessing over 17,000 cases of rodent-related and parasitic infections among its displaced population. This is the reality left behind by the genocide, an environment forced upon Gaza by Israel’s destruction and its total ban on the entry of insecticides and life-saving medicines.”
As the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reported, there is
“a proliferation of rodents, cockroaches, flies, and other pests, contributing to disease transmission, with a high prevalence of scabies, lice, and skin infections. The scale and persistence of such public health risks are linked to overcrowding, inadequate sanitation, and limited access to hygiene services.”
“Israel has, over the last 30 months, maximised its efforts to create as many secondary deaths as possible.”
Investigations of the various displacement sites in which the majority of the population are living
“indicated that rodents or pests were frequently visible in 1,326 of the 1,644 assessed sites (81 percent), affecting about 1.45 million people. Additional alerts highlighted persistent sanitation?related risks, including sewage in surrounding streets (61 per cent of sites), accumulated solid waste (56 per cent), and flooding or stagnant water (24 per cent).
Traces of open defecation and dead animals were also reported. Only 3 per cent of sites indicated no visible environmental health hazards within or around the site perimeter.”
As the report added,
“These environmental conditions are closely mirrored in reported household-level health concerns. A total of 1,322 sites (81 percent) reported the presence of skin infections or rashes, including scabies, lice, bedbugs, or other ectoparasitic infestations. Skin infections or rashes were reported in nearly two-thirds of sites, lice in over 65 per cent, and bedbugs in more than half.
Other ectoparasitic infestations were identified in over one-quarter of sites. According to health partners, more than 70,000 cases of rodent and ectoparasitic infestations have been reported so far in 2026.”
Aid agencies are doing what they can, but are restrained by deliberate Israeli obstruction, either because they “rely on items that are largely unavailable in Gaza,” or because they are “often difficult to take in” because “implementation requires lengthy processes including procurement, approvals, shipment, deployment and safe application.”
The genocide, in other words, still grinds on, deliberately maintained by Israel, which is clearly still trying to kill as many Palestinians as possible.
Israel Still Wants Everyone in Gaza to Die
Palestinians mourning relatives killed by an Israeli airstrike of Deir el-Balah, Gaza Strip, Jan. 12, 2024. (UNRWA /Ashraf Amra/Wikimedia Commons/ CC BY-SA 3.0)
When pushed, Israeli officials still talk about their hopes for the “voluntary migration” of the population, as though it is some kind of humanitarian option, but it has always been a mirage, because no country will take in significant numbers of the Palestinians. This is either because of increasing anti-immigrant sentiment, or because it would so clearly involve the crimes of ethnic cleansing or forced displacement on a significant scale.
When Israel reluctantly re-opened the Rafah Crossing with Egypt in February, it was an opportunity for senior Israeli officials to demonstrate their commitment to their claim of wanting to encourage people to leave, but, instead, they have persistently restricted the numbers of those allowed out.
That prompted the Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom to ask in a headline, “Why is Israel preventing Gazans from leaving?”
Polling conducted last year, by what Reuters called “a think tank based in Ramallah and funded by Western donors,” which may not have been reliable, apparently found
“that 49% of those surveyed declared that they would be willing to apply to Israel to help them emigrate via Israeli ports and airports, against 50% who said they would not be willing to do so.”
The reason Israel doesn’t want to make even the most cursory efforts to encourage Palestinians to leave Gaza, is, as senior officials, pundits and far too many Israeli citizens have made all too clear, with relentless barbarism since Oct. 7, is because they want everyone in Gaza to die.
I first pointed this out nearly a year ago, when Israel stepped up its relentless extermination in Gaza after deliberately breaking a six-week ceasefire in January and February, in an article entitled, “Israel Wants to Kill Everyone in Gaza.”
Still from a U.N. film strip, circa 1949, on the 1948 Genocide Convention. (U.N. Photo)
Not only did the Israelis admit it themselves, but so to have numerous international organizations and genocide experts since January 2024, when the International Court of Justice warned of a “plausible” genocide being undertaken in Gaza.
They have concluded, with increasing certainty, that the cumulative effect of all Israel’s actions since October 2023 has been undoubtedly and deliberately genocidal in intent, fulfilling four of the five indicators of genocide in the 1948 Genocide Convention.
These are “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,” by 1). “killing members of the group,” by 2). “causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group,” by 3). “deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,” and by 4). “imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.”
Amnesty International concluded in December 2024 that Israel’s actions constituted a genocide.
The U.N.’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel, reached the same conclusion in September 2025.
Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur for Palestine, has published a series of reports defining the contours of Israel’s genocide and its support through governments in the West and businesses worldwide: “Genocide as colonial erasure,” “From economy of occupation to economy of genocide,” “Gaza Genocide: a collective crime” and “Torture and genocide.”
And in July 2025 the prominent U.S.-Israeli genocide scholar Omer Bartov wrote, in an article for The New York Times, “I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It,” that, “My inescapable conclusion has become that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people.”
In November 2024, Israel was finally hit with a legal blow that it couldn’t simply shrug off, when the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then-Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Although devious efforts were subsequently made to topple the chief prosecutor, Karim Khan KC, in a manufactured sexual harassment scandal, and although the U.S. has obligingly waged warfare on the court through the imposition of sweeping sanctions on its judges, the Netanyahu and Gallant arrest warrants still stand and they are both, as a result, unable to visit the 125 signatory countries to the Rome Statute that initiated the ICC in 1998.
From Demanding Silent Compliance to AI-Aided Mass Slaughter
The Israeli Air Force bombed the al-Jalaa Building which housed press offices in Gaza, May 15, 2021. (Osama Eid, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons)
The most grotesque innovation of the last 30 months has involved the use of AI (artificial intelligence) in military targeting.
For most of the 16 years before Oct. 7, 2023, Israel sought to control the trapped population of Gaza through an insistence on silent compliance.
Despite its total control of the border, not only preventing the entry and exit of the population, but also restricting the supplies that were allowed in, the Palestinians were meant to endure these persistent and deliberate deprivations in total silence.
When they did respond — primarily through militants firing missiles at Israel — the response was brutal, via intensive bombing campaigns that were sickeningly described by Israeli officials as a regular process of “mowing the lawn.”
Every few years, these “wars” took place — Operation Summer Rains, a four-month offensive in 2006, Operation Cast Lead, a brutal three-week assault in 2009, the week-long Operation Pillar of Defense in 2012, the 50 harrowing days of Operation Protective Edge in 2014, and the three-day Operation Black Belt in 2019.
Some of these attacks involved specific targeting, because Israel has controlled the Palestinian population registry for Gaza and the West Bank since its illegal occupation began in 1967, with any changes — including the registration of births, marriages, divorces, deaths or changes of address — requiring its approval.
With this vast database at its disposal, the opportunities for mass surveillance offered by smartphone technology, and the dawning capabilities of AI programs to process information more rapidly than human analysts, meant that, by 2021, when Israel launched Operation Guardian of the Walls, which lasted for 11 days, it was triumphantly described as “the world’s first AI war,” with The Jerusalem Post enthusiastically explaining how,
“in the years prior to the fighting, the IDF established an advanced AI technological platform that centralized all data on terrorist groups in the Gaza Strip onto one system that enabled the analysis and extraction of the intelligence.”
As the article proceeded to explain, “Soldiers in Unit 8200, an Intelligence Corps elite unit, pioneered algorithms and code that led to several new programs called ‘Alchemist’, ‘Gospel’ and ‘Depth of Wisdom’, which were developed and used during the fighting.”
The data was collected through “signal intelligence (SIGINT), visual intelligence (VISINT), human intelligence (HUMINT), [and] geographical intelligence (GEOINT),” including information collated “in real time.”
The article enthused about how the IDF stated its belief that “using AI helped shorten the length of the fighting, having been effective and quick in gathering targets using super-cognition.”
Aviv Kochavi, then the head of the IDF, captured most compellingly how the new technology was transforming Israel’s concept of warfare. “In the past we would produce 50 targets in Gaza per year. Now, this machine produces 100 targets in a single day,” he said in admiration.
“The most grotesque innovation of the last 30 months has involved the use of AI in military targeting.”
By October 2023, Israel had had another two and a half years to expand its AI-driven military targeting, [such as the Lavender program] and the result was devastation on an unprecedented scale, as apartment block after apartment block was levelled, and entire neighbourhoods were destroyed.
The attacks looked remarkably like arbitrary carpet-bombing, but when some of those involved in the AI-driven military targeting programs publicly expressed their misgivings in revelatory investigations published in November 2023 and April 2024 (which I wrote about here and here), they revealed that what looked like random carpet-bombing was actually the result of a giddy enthusiasm amongst military commanders for the alleged accuracy of these apparently miraculous technological developments that allowed them to target and kill at a rate that was previously inconceivable.
While the commanders viewed the programs as a miracle, those who were perturbed behind the scenes recognized fundamental problems that were irreconcilable with notions of proportionality and accuracy that ought to underpin any military operations, according to an article in +972 Magazine.
These whistleblowers identified a 10 percent error rate, which is shockingly high, but, more fundamentally, they were alarmed by the parameters set by those who were establishing the targeting programs, primarily because they included “low-level” targets, who may have been nothing more than employees of Hamas’ civilian administrative government, who were not legitimate targets, but also because “a system of mass surveillance” had been established which assessed and ranked the likelihood of activity in the military wing of Hamas or PIJ (Palestinian Islamic Jihad), assigning “almost every single person in Gaza a rating from 1 to 100, expressing how likely it is that they are a militant.”
As I explained in an article last month, “The Horrors of AI-Driven Military Targeting, From Gaza to Iran“:
“Having learned ‘to identify characteristics of known Hamas and PIJ operatives, whose information was fed to the machine as training data’, the program then located similar ‘features’ amongst the general population. Those with ‘several different incriminating features’ would ‘reach a high rating’, and would automatically become ‘a potential target for assassination.’
Alarmingly, however, ‘These “features’ might include ‘being in a Whatsapp group with a known militant, changing cell phone every few months, and changing addresses frequently’ — even though the former is no guarantee of militancy, and the latter two might well involve no militancy whatsoever. As the sources explained, the AI program ‘sometimes mistakenly flagged individuals who had communication patterns similar to known Hamas or PIJ operatives — including police and civil defense workers, militants’ relatives, residents who happened to have a name and nickname identical to that of an operative, and Gazans who used a device that once [unknowingly] belonged to a Hamas operative.’”
As a result, in the early weeks of the genocide, the AI program “clocked as many as 37,000 Palestinians as suspected militants,” identifying them, and their homes, as “targets for possible air strikes,” even though that figure was more than the entirety of Hamas’s military membership, according to official Israeli statements.
Another key aspect of the programming was the tolerance of mass civilian casualties when pursuing “high-value” targets, via unheard-of rates of “collateral damage.”
One, early on, involved “the killing of approximately 300 civilians” in an attack aimed at one individual, a figure that appalled an international law expert at the U.S. State Department, who told The Guardian that they had “never remotely heard” of even “a one to 15 ratio being deemed acceptable.”
In addition, another program, the sickeningly-named “Where’s Daddy?,” deliberately targeted individuals “while they were in their homes — usually at night while their whole families were present — rather than during the course of military activity,” because, “from what they regarded as an intelligence standpoint, it was easier to locate the individuals in their private houses.”
As one of the sources explained, “In practice, the principle of proportionality did not exist.”
Nor, either, did any meaningful human oversight.
One source, as I described it, “stated that human personnel often served only as a ‘rubber stamp’ for the machine’s decisions, adding that, normally, they would personally devote only about ’20 seconds’ to each target before authorizing a bombing — just to make sure the Lavender-marked target is male.”
That 20-second review was therefore, the only measure of human oversight that prevented what was, in essence, a policy that I have described as “automated genocide.”
Legally, of course, this is a nightmare, as those involving in assessing the legality of war are increasingly recognizing.
An article for the Georgetown Security Studies Review, for example, stated that, “By relying on AI, in some cases almost granting it executive authority, Israel is undermining principles of proportionality, distinction, and precaution,” as identified in a U.N. report in June 2024, which assessed attacks on civilian infrastructure in the first three months of Israel’s genocidal assault, before the central involvement of AI-driven military targeting had even been established.
As the Georgetown article noted, huge questions need to be asked about the conduct of war in the AI era when “the fate of thousands of lives [is] at the discretion of an automated system” and when the removal of “even the slightest shred of humanity from it leaves us all as potential targets.”
Israel Expands Depravity From Gaza to Lebanon & Iran
Israeli airstrike on Hezbollah’s Beirut headquarters on Sept. 27, 2024. (Jimmyp84/Wikimedia Commons/ CC0)
What we still don’t know, as Israel has eviscerated all sense of proportionality in its attacks on civilians, and has deliberately erased distinctions between militants and administrative workers in Gaza’s civilian infrastructure, is how much its other deadly targeting of key protected individuals — medical personnel and journalists — has involved AI-driven “terrorism” assessments, or whether these have been cynically grafted on after they were identified and killed.
What is clear, however, is that there has never been a conflict in which so many medical personnel and journalists have been killed, with so much deliberate misinformation invented afterwards in a sickening effort to justify their slaughter.
Over 270 Palestinian journalists have been targeted and murdered in Gaza, and in September 2025 the health ministry reported that 1,722 health workers have been killed, with this figure including some of the 562 aid workers who have also been killed.
What we also know is that Israel has expanded the depraved, disproportionate model it established in Gaza to Lebanon, which has been suffering from Israeli depredations throughout the long blood-soaked decades of Israel’s existence.
In September 2024, stepping up its attacks on Hezbollah, which has long supported the Palestinians and has repeatedly engaged in attacks on Israel, a truly depraved mass attack, involving booby-trapped pagers and walkie-talkies, was initiated, with the support of the U.S. tech firm Palantir, which was reportedly aimed at Hezbollah militants, but which, in reality, killed, maimed and mutilated numerous civilians.
U.N. experts, who condemned the attacks as “terrifying” violations of international law, noted that they
“killed at least 32 people and maimed or injured 3,250, including 200 critically. Among the dead [were] a boy and a girl, as well as medical personnel. Around 500 people suffered severe eye injuries, including a diplomat. Others suffered grave injuries to their faces, hands and bodies.”
Israel followed up by assassinating Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary-general of Hezbollah, in an attack in Beirut, during a sustained period of savage attacks on Lebanon that resembled the destruction rained down incessantly on Gaza.
On the deadliest day, Sept. 23, 2024, 558 people were killed, including 50 children and 94 women, and 14 ambulances and fire engines were also targeted and attacked, and on Oct. 1 Israeli troops invaded Lebanon for the sixth time since 1978.
Although a ceasefire was declared in November, Israel treated it with the same scorn it has applied to ceasefires in Gaza, and on March 2, two days after Israel persuaded the U.S. to foolishly initiate a war on Iran, it resumed full-scale attacks, also, as in Gaza, imperiously ordering the mass evacuation of Lebanese civilians, creating over a million internal refugees.
On March 16, Israel followed up by invading southern Lebanon, aiming to occupy the whole of the land up to the Litani River, and, as was explained in The Guardian by Mohamad Bazzi, the director of the Hagop Kevorkian Center for Near Eastern Studies and a journalism professor at New York University, “pledging to clear frontline villages of their inhabitants and establish a new ‘security zone’ that would be devoid of people and occupied by Israeli troops.”
Israel’s fanatical defense minister, Israel Katz, explicitly promised another Gaza, stating that his forces would destroy “all houses” in Lebanese border villages “in accordance with the model used in Rafah and Beit Hanoun,” towns in Gaza whose existence has been completely erased.
Israel’s Perilous Refusal to Submit to Any Restraint
Aftermath of Israel’s April 8 strike on Beirut. (Megaphone/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 4.0)
Israel’s behavior has, above all, demonstrated its extraordinary arrogance. Having seduced Trump into attacking Iran based on promises that another assassination — of Iran’s leader Ayatollah Khameini — would sow discord and lead to regime change, the U.S. soon discovered, to its dismay, that Iran was a formidable adversary, and had been preparing, since unprovoked attacks last year, for retaliation.
After successfully targeting U.S. bases throughout the Middle East, Iran proceeded to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, precipitating a global energy crisis whose magnitude is being deliberately hidden by politicians and the media throughout the West, but which was significant enough for Trump to recognize the need for a ceasefire.
For Iran, any ceasefire deal also had to include Lebanon, but Israel refuses to be constrained by anyone, including the U.S. or Iran, because it simply doesn’t care about anyone or anything other than itself.
This was made clear when, last September, as Gaza ceasefire negotiations were taking place, Israel brazenly targeted Hamas officials who were meeting in Doha, in Qatar, violating the powerful Gulf state’s sovereignty, and requiring frantic diplomatic efforts by the U.S. to limit the attack’s political damage.
It has also been made clear in the responses, within the U.S., to the deadly attack on a girls’ elementary school in Minab, in Iran, on the very first day of the “war,” when, it seems, Palantir-developed AI technology misidentified the school as a military target.
The attack killed 168 people, mostly schoolgirls, and, in the U.S., it has led, at the very least, to some hand-wringing, and to noticeable unease within parts of the U.S. military.
In contrast, within Israel, and with the handful of exceptions noted above, there has been no meaningful discussion about the extent to which AI-driven military targeting is not a miracle, but a flawed system that has contributed to the colossal and unjustifiable slaughter of civilians in vast numbers, and which needs serious oversight before it proceeds any further.
Israel’s most disturbing actions over the last two months, however, took place on April 8, when, in a deliberately provocative snub to the U.S.-Iran ceasefire deal, it launched the most devastating attacks ever seen on Beirut and southern Lebanon, striking over a hundred targets in a 10-minute period, claiming it was targeting Hezbollah strongholds without, of course, providing any evidence, and killing at least 357 people, who seemed quite clearly not to be the 250 Hezbollah “operatives and commanders” who Israel claimed to have killed.
Despite the threat that Israel’s actions pose to the Iranian ceasefire, it has still continued to engage in the destruction of southern Lebanon, is still destroying village after village, and also attracted global condemnation through its deliberate targeted killing of the renowned and tenacious Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil, who, of course, it subsequently smeared as a “terrorist.”
Whereas the U.S. still has allies throughout the Middle East which it needs to placate, even with President Donald Trump’s tendency to insult and belittle even those closest to him, Israel has no friends or allies whatsoever, just a handful of countries that it manipulates — largely through infiltration — to fulfill its aims.
As its arrogance and its derangement have grown over the last 30 months, this now means endless war on as many fronts as possible not only against military targets, but against entire civilian populations who are all, following the Gaza model, regarded as, in one way or another, “associated” with Hamas, or Hezbollah, or the Iranian “terror state,” or even just through ever-more hysterical interpretations of anti-Semitism, which the Israeli state has long insisted means any criticism whatsoever of its actions.
What the last 30 months have also shown us is that Israel’s predatory notions of “self-defense” extend far beyond the Middle East, via high-level influence over compliant governments in the West, and especially the U.S., the U.K. and Germany, which, as well as being Israel’s main arms suppliers (in the case of the U.S. and Germany), have also obligingly initiated draconian clampdowns on free speech, protest and direct action in defense of Israel, and where (again, in the U.S. and Germany) alarming efforts are also being made to make citizenship or employment dependant on allegiance to Israel.
Most alarmingly, as the dark forces behind the AI revolution openly manifest their true ugliness, not just via their enthusiasm for AI-driven warfare, but also for the surveillance and control of entire populations, Israel’s reach also now threatens all of us, wherever we are.
As Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the fanatically pro-Israeli Anti-Defamation League (ADL), explained at an event held by the Sinai Temple in Los Angeles in March, the group has analysts “working round the clock” to “take down” those regarded as “extremists” through monitoring social media and other platforms, sharing the information it gathers with the F.B.I.
The extensive surveillance operation that he outlined “tracks activity across social media, messaging apps, video games, cryptocurrency platforms, podcasts, short-form video, Wikipedia and large language models.”
For those paying attention, it has been clear throughout the last 30 months that what has been happening in Gaza will not stay in Gaza.
Instead, the genocide in Gaza is a template — for a world of limitless slaughter, and of total surveillance and control, that will persist as long as Israel, and those backing it, continue to be allowed to wield their depraved power.
For all our sakes, Israel and its backers need, across their many spheres of influence, to be restrained and disarmed.
Andy Worthington is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, photographer, film-maker and singer-songwriter (the lead singer and main songwriter for the London-based band The Four Fathers, whose music is available via Bandcamp). He is the co-founder of the Close Guantánamo campaign and the successful We Stand With Shaker campaign of 2014-15, and the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. He is also the co-director (with Polly Nash) of the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo”, which you can watch on YouTube here. In addition to his Substack account, he can also be found on Facebook (and here), Twitter and YouTube.
This article is from the author’s Substack.
The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
