In a rare move, five pro-Palestine direct-action defendants dismissed their lawyers and delivered impassioned speeches about Britain’s role in Gaza genocide, John McEvoy reports.
“I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action” signs at a demonstration in support of the direct action group in Parliament Square, London, July 5, 2025. (Alisdare Hickson / Flickr / CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
By John McEvoy
Declassified UK
Five Palestine Action activists dismissed their lawyers this week and addressed a jury directly about how they targeted an Israeli weapons factory in Bristol.
The activists — Charlotte Head, Fatema Zainab Rajwani, Zoe Rogers, Leona Kamio and Jordan Devlin – face charges of criminal damage in connection with a raid on Elbit Systems in August 2024.
On Wednesday morning, shortly before closing speeches were due to be heard at Woolwich Crown Court, those five defendants elected to represent themselves rather than be represented by their barristers.
They said they had not dismissed their barristers over any shortcomings, but because of perceived constraints put on them and their legal representation by the court.
“It might seem odd that I’m now speaking to you from out here, instead of in the dock — trust me it’s odd for me too,” Head declared.
“Sadly, despite how unbelievably kind and smart and wise my barristers are… I no longer feel like they are permitted to represent me in a way that does us all justice,” she added.
Rajwani added: “I simply wanted to speak to you as an ordinary person. And I wanted to take this time to speak to you as an everyday person.”
Facing the jury, the defendants set out to explain how the genocide in Gaza had impacted them, the importance of jury trials, and, ultimately, why they should be found not guilty.
A sixth defendant, Samuel Corner, who is facing an additional charge of grievous bodily harm with intent, chose to keep his legal representation.
Despair
Woolwich Crown Court. (Joe Lauria)
The defendants spoke freely in court for the first time about the sense of hopelessness and despair that they experienced amid the Gaza genocide.
They also voiced disgust at the U.K. government’s complicity in Israeli war crimes and the presence of Israeli arms firms on British soil.
Head recalled how she went on local marches and national demonstrations while her “mental health plummeted watching what was happening and feeling helpless to stop it.”
An email to her local MP came back with an “automated response,” she said.
Kamio, who worked at a nursery, spoke about “the conflict of going to work — teaching young children — and going home to watch videos of children losing everything”.
She felt “sick going to bed feeling helpless witnessing massacres” and felt “compelled to act in defence of those children.”
Rajwani described how she “decided to dig the well myself. And what I mean by that was instead of waiting for these weapons to stop, I went straight to the source.”
None of the defendants expressed regret about their actions.
Jordan Devlin declared he does “not regret signing up for this action” despite “being beaten up” by Elbit’s security guards.
“I am so proud I took part in this,” said Zoe Rogers. “I am proud that I overcame my fear and took action because of course I was scared, you don’t just break into an Israeli weapons factory for fun.”
Rogers added:
“I can say with absolute certainty that this is the best thing that I have ever done”.
The defendants also emphasised the importance of trial by jury. Devlin remarked that jurors “have the independence to make your minds up about all of the facts you’ve heard.”
John McEvoy is chief reporter for Declassified UK. John is an historian and filmmaker whose work focuses on British foreign policy and Latin America. His PhD was on Britain’s Secret Wars in Colombia between 1948 and 2009, and he is currently working on a documentary about Britain’s role in the rise of Augusto Pinochet.
This article is from Declassified UK.
Views expressed in this article and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
