Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Iran Losing Its Leverage in Strait of Hormuz

August 31, 2026

Iran Vows Plan To Overcome US Economic Siege

August 31, 2026

Corporate Profits Booming, Signaling Good Times Ahead

August 31, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Other News
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
The Other News
Home»Independent Journalism»Federal Court Blocks FIU’s Ban On Expressive Activities Inside University Buildings
Independent Journalism

Federal Court Blocks FIU’s Ban On Expressive Activities Inside University Buildings

nickBy nickAugust 31, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Alexandra Martinez Prism

A federal judge has temporarily blocked Florida International University (FIU) from enforcing its blanket ban on expressive activities inside university buildings. The ruling favored students who challenged disciplinary action stemming from a silent protest against the university’s agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The preliminary injunction, issued Aug. 24, comes 12 days after the student-led group ICEBreakers filed a lawsuit challenging FIU’s policy and the university’s decision to discipline seven students who wore shirts reading “ICE OFF FIU” during a campus event featuring FIU President Jeanette Nuñez.

“Formally, the ruling prevents FIU from enforcing its policy against only members of ICEBreakers, but the court’s reasoning makes clear that it would be unconstitutional if enforced against anyone else as well,” according to a press release from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Florida, which is representing the students.

“Blocking this regulation means students can start the fall semester without fear of being punished for peacefully protesting,” said Max Fondren, president of ICEBreakers, in the press release. “Our work to end FIU’s cruel and unnecessary decision to deputize campus police as ICE agents will continue.”

FIU did not immediately respond to Prism’s request for comment.

In its ruling, the court cited decades of legal precedent protecting student expression on college campuses. The judge wrote that student speech generally cannot be restricted unless it materially disrupts an institution’s educational mission, involves substantial disorder, or infringes on the rights of others.

The students argue that their demonstration met none of those conditions. They silently wore protest shirts at the event, actions they say did not interfere with the program or the rights of other attendees.

“FIU’s discomfort with our message does not override our right to protest against the university’s 287(g) agreement—nor will it get us to stop,” said Andrew Caro, one of the seven students facing disciplinary action. “Our protest did not derail the event, nor did it impact anyone else’s rights. It was non-disruptive and fully protected speech.”

Nicholas Warren, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Florida, said in a press release that the ruling reinforces students’ longstanding constitutional protections.

“We are pleased the court agreed with us that FIU’s blanket ban likely violates the First Amendment,” Warren said. “The law has protected students’ right to protest for generations, and this order reaffirms that fundamental freedom.”

Adam Saper, an attorney with Community Justice Project, which is also supporting the students, said the case has implications beyond the seven students involved.

“This isn’t only about their right to free speech—it’s about every student on campus, especially the immigrant students who walk in every day carrying real fear of ICE, when all they’re trying to do is learn and build a future for themselves,” Saper said.

The dispute stems from FIU’s decision last year to become the first university in the country to voluntarily deputize its campus police through the federal government’s 287(g) program, giving participating officers certain immigration-enforcement powers in cooperation with ICE.

The agreement generated concern among students and faculty and helped spur the creation of ICEBreakers. Members of the group repeatedly sought to meet with Nuñez, who has supported the agreement and has authority to end it, according to the ACLU. After those requests were unsuccessful, the students held the silent demonstration that led to the disciplinary action.

The preliminary injunction allows the students to continue expressing their opposition without facing enforcement of FIU’s challenged policy while the lawsuit proceeds.

Editorial Team:
Sahar Fatima, Lead Editor
Carolyn Copeland, Top Editor
Rashmee Kumar, Copy Editor

Alexandra is a Cuban-American writer based in Miami, with an interest in immigration, the economy, gender justice, and the environment. Her work has appeared in CNN, Vice, and Catapult Magazine, among others.

Image Natalie La Roche Pietri

WLRNFILE: Students chanted and held up signs in protest to FIU’s partnership with ICE.

Editor’s Note: At a moment when the once vaunted model of responsible journalism is overwhelmingly the play thing of self-serving billionaires and their corporate scribes, alternatives of integrity are desperately needed, and ScheerPost is one of them. Please support our independent journalism by contributing to our online donation platform, Network for Good, or send a check to our new PO Box. We can’t thank you enough, and promise to keep bringing you this kind of vital news.

You can also make a donation to our PayPal or subscribe to our Patreon.

Please share this story and help us grow our network!




Post navigation





Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

Iran Vows Plan To Overcome US Economic Siege

August 31, 2026

LA Landlords Have A New Way To Make Renters Pay More

August 31, 2026

A People(s)-Centered Human Rights Critique Of ‘An Open Letter To Iran’s Political Prisoners’

August 30, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

Iran Losing Its Leverage in Strait of Hormuz

Alternative News August 31, 2026

A conventional wisdom has begun to settle over the war with Iran: Iran won. Source…

Iran Vows Plan To Overcome US Economic Siege

August 31, 2026

Corporate Profits Booming, Signaling Good Times Ahead

August 31, 2026

Class War Behind The Flags

August 31, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.