Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

The College Replacement Economy

July 24, 2026

Why Would Trump Agree to the Saudi Nuclear Deal?

July 24, 2026

The Collapse of the Bipartisan Consensus Over US-Israel Ties

July 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TheOthernews
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
TheOthernews
Home»Politics & Policy»Justice Kagan Rejects Charge that Supreme Court Is “Rubber Stamp” for Trump Administration
Politics & Policy

Justice Kagan Rejects Charge that Supreme Court Is “Rubber Stamp” for Trump Administration

nickBy nickJuly 24, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Some legal and political commentators claim that the Supreme Court has bent over backwards to appease or affirm the Trump Administration. In recent remarks before the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference, as reported by Politico, Justice Elena Kagan rejected this common narrative.

From Politico:

“I don’t see this as a court that is just like, ‘We’re just going to rubber stamp what the current administration does.’ You know, quite the opposite,” Kagan said to a judicial conference here Thursday. “I think that that is a bad rap.” . . .

Kagan, a liberal justice and Obama appointee, said the 6-3 decision scuttling Trump’s tariffs was extraordinary.

“Tariffs is probably the key policy issue for this president. I mean, something he campaigned on, he ran on, he cared an enormous amount about,” she said. “I don’t think that there are all that many decisions in the recent times, where a court strikes down such an important policy to a a sitting president.”

That the Court is conservative–and reaches conservative decisions–is not evidence that it is under President Trump’s sway.

“You just have to deal with the fact that there’s a conservative court doing things that conservative jurists have long thought it appropriate to do, and I can really dislike that. But it has nothing to do, I think, with becoming the arm of this current administration,” she said.

Kagan also said that the justices were unaffected by President Trump’s decision to attend oral argument in the birthright citizenship case, another case of extreme importance to Trump in which the Court rejected his position, and even dissenting justices raised questions about the breadth of the Trump Administration’s position.

“It was sort of like….from the court’s point of view, a non-event,” Kagan said in her first public remarks on the unusual spectacle. “Honestly, the vibes in the courtroom were the vibes in the courtroom on any other day.” . . .

Kagan also noted that Trump left about halfway through the two-hour session. “It was a long argument. You really did kind of think he probably had other things to do,” she said.

“So, I don’t know. I think he probably won’t come back,” she added, prompting laughter from the audience.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

Why Would Trump Agree to the Saudi Nuclear Deal?

July 24, 2026

Sharia Divorce Law in American Courts

July 24, 2026

There Is an Error in the Supreme Court’s Analysis in Loper Bright.

July 24, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The College Replacement Economy

Alternative News July 24, 2026

Students have taken on five figures of debt to buy back a certification that their…

Why Would Trump Agree to the Saudi Nuclear Deal?

July 24, 2026

The Collapse of the Bipartisan Consensus Over US-Israel Ties

July 24, 2026

Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement sets a bad precedent

July 24, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.