Critics assail Starmer’s support of Israel’s genocide on Gaza, his government’s terrorist proscription of Palestine Action and his neglect of the working class, Brad Reed reports.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer during a press conference at his executive office in No. 10 Downing Street, London, last week. (Lauren Hurley / No 10/ Flickr/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
By Brad Reed
Common Dreams
U.K, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced his resignation Monday, less than two years after his Labour Party swept into power in a landslide election.
In his resignation speech, Starmer said that he was stepping down because members of his party did not feel he was the best choice to lead them into the next general election, with polls showing the far-right anti-immigration Reform Party currently on track to receive the most votes.
Starmer also said that whomever is chosen as his successor “will inherit a Britain that is far stronger and fairer than the one I inherited two years ago, better prepared for the challenges ahead and better able to ensure the Labour Party secures a second term in office.”
Starmer’s progressive critics disputed this characterization of his governance, which they said has done little more than legitimize the far right.
Specifically, critics pointed to the Labour government’s continued support of Israel in its genocidal assault on Gaza, its decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist group, and its efforts to court far-right voters by restricting immigration as some of its most destructive actions.
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said that Starmer had wasted the large majority that Labour had won and had done little if anything to improve the lives of the U.K. working class.
“Keir Starmer could have ended child poverty, homelessness and the grotesque levels of inequality in this country,” Corbyn wrote. “Instead, he abandoned those in need, destroyed our civil liberties, and facilitated genocide in Gaza. That is how this prime minister will be remembered — and that is the legacy of moral and political bankruptcy he leaves behind.”
Starmer, left, and Corbyn, then leader of the U.K. Labour Party, at a 2019 press conference. (Jeremy Corbyn/ Wikimedia Commons/ CC BY 2.0)
Corbyn added that “getting rid of Keir Starmer is not enough,” as “we need to get rid of the politics he represents: corporate greed, anti-migrant rhetoric, and endless war.”
Member of Parliament Zarah Sultana, a former Labour MP who has since joined Corbyn’s Your Party, noted after watching the prime minister’s speech that “the most emotion Keir Starmer has shown is over losing his job, not enabling the genocide of the Palestinian people.”
“Good riddance,” Sultana said. “His next stop should be The Hague.”
Sultana speaking in the House of Commons in June 2025. (House of Commons/ Flickr/ CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
Zack Polanski, leader of the Green Party, predicted that Starmer’s premiership would be remembered entirely negatively.
“Bills up. Wages too low,” Polanski wrote on X, summarizing life in the U.K. under Starmer’s leadership: “Record profits for oil and gas. Fifty richest families with more wealth than 50% of population. Shit in our rivers. Pensioners jailed for protesting. Migrants thrown under the bus. Supporting a genocide. That’s Starmer’s legacy.”
Bills up.
Wages too low.
Record profits for Oil & Gas.
50 richest families with more wealth than 50% of population.
Shit in our rivers.
Pensioners jailed for protesting.
Migrants thrown under the bus.
Supporting a Genocide.
That’s Starmer’s legacy.
— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) June 22, 2026
Journalist Owen Jones delivered a similarly scathing assessment.
“Keir Starmer lied through his teeth to become Labour leader,” Jones wrote. “He justified Israeli war crimes, arrested opponents of genocide, attacked pensioners, disabled people, and migrants, pocketed freebies, crushed dissent, and threw others under the bus to save himself. History damns him.”
Former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis delivered a lengthy rundown of Starmer’s failures as prime minister, arguing that he “was not merely a disappointment” but “a mendacious figure of ethical decrepitude, a man who won the Labour Party leadership based on promises that he jettisoned five seconds after winning.”
“History will remember Mr. Starmer as a man without conviction,” Varoufakis wrote, “a prime minister who offers not a shred of honesty, but merely the cruel illusion of change. He is ethically decrepit because he had chosen, consciously, to abandon principle for power. And for that, history will indict him. Good riddance, I say.”
Brad Reed is a staff writer for Common Dreams.
This article is from Common Dreams.
The views expressed in this article and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
Please Donate to the
Spring Fund Drive!
