Close Menu
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

After 40 years, no one has produced a workable single-payer health care plan

June 4, 2026

The war powers resolution on the Iran war: What’s next?

June 4, 2026

Google aims to debug California and Florida with 64 million mosquitoes

June 4, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TheOthernews
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Alternative News
    • Politics & Policy
    • Independent Journalism
    • Geopolitics & War
    • Economy & Power
    • Investigative Reports
  • Double Speak
    • Media Bias
    • Fact Check & Misinformation
    • Political Spin
    • Propaganda & Narrative
  • Truth or Scare
    • UFO & Extraterrestrial
    • Myth Busting & Debunking
    • Paranormal & Mysteries
    • Conspiracy Theories
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
TheOthernews
Home»Political Spin»250 years later, Benjamin Franklin’s warning is still relevant
Political Spin

250 years later, Benjamin Franklin’s warning is still relevant

nickBy nickMay 27, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


This summer, the United States celebrates its 250th birthday.

In 1776, few people believed this new version of self-government would last.

After the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin was asked what kind of government the Founding Fathers had created.

“A republic,” he replied, “if you can keep it.”

If.

It’s rare that a new form of government lasts dozens of years, let alone 250.

How did America do it?

In my new video, people give reasons:

“In the U.S. Constitution, you see a lot of phrases like ‘Congress shall not’ or ‘No law shall be passed,'” Rob Henderson, the author of Troubled who coined the term “luxury beliefs,” points out. “It’s not about what government will do for you. It’s focused on [how] Congress and the government are not going to interfere in your lives.”

That made America different, says economist Donald Boudreaux: “Compared to most other governments throughout history, ours has been the freest and the most liberal in the sense of tolerating differences in people and accepting economic change.”

Daniel Di Martino, who escaped Venezuela to come here, says: “We’re all immigrants fleeing from something—dictatorships, tyranny, socialism. The descendants of those people were willing to take more risks, and also willing to defend their liberties.”

That made Americans different from Europeans.

“By necessity, Americans were very independent,” says Linnea Lueken of the Heartland Institute. “We went out into untamed wilderness and established towns that didn’t have to lean on a central government to function properly.”

Without nobility controlling property, ordinary people could own land, start a business, and keep the profits.

“America is more devoted to property rights than any other country, and that is why America is more free,” argues Ryan McMaken of the Mises Institute.

Property rights and limits on government allowed Americans to try the new things that made America prosperous.

The Founders didn’t want a government that took care of people. They wanted a government that mostly left us alone.

They created “three branches of government designed specifically to check each other,” says author Wilfred Reilly. “Because so many mistakes are made by leaders.”

“Leaders” do make mistakes, constantly.

Yet today, we keep increasing their power. There is that instinct to say, “Problem? Government should fix that. There ought to be a law!”

But the more laws governments pass, the more power politicians have and the less autonomy individuals have. The Washington swamp keeps growing, under both Democrats and Republicans, most of whom ignore the limits our smart Founders put into our Constitution.

It’s good that there are free market think tanks that push back.

I like the Cato Institute’s mission: “Keep the principles, ideas, and moral case for liberty alive.”

Cato President Peter Goettler recently wrote, “The forces of liberalism unleashed in the Founding era ultimately brought the curtain down on slavery and have persistently extended rights, liberty, and the American dream.”

But he also points out today’s threats to that dream: “Towering debt we continue to accrue…masked government agents disappearing people without due process; targeting of political enemies…tariffs fluctuating at the president’s whim…enmeshing of government with private enterprise…foreign adventurism absent congressional involvement or national debate.”

Sigh. All true.

The Constitution says only Congress can declare war, but presidents from both parties now grab power that the Founders never intended for them to have.

Harry Truman intervened in Korea without a formal declaration of war. Likewise, John F. Kennedy expanded U.S. military involvement in Vietnam. Richard Nixon expanded the war into Cambodia. George H.W. Bush ordered the invasion of Panama. Bill Clinton engaged in military operations in Bosnia and Yugoslavia. President Donald Trump launched military actions in Iran. All without congressional approval.

“That’s not what America was about,” says McMaken. “America was focused on rights and protecting them.”

“The first nation in history founded on the inalienable rights of the individual,” adds the Atlas Society’s Jennifer Grossman. “It recognized that man is not a sacrificial animal for the collective, the king or the majority.”

“That alone makes us rich,” agrees Boudreaux. “That alone makes us more likely to survive another 250 years.”

For 10 generations, the American republic has prospered.

Benjamin Franklin’s question is still relevant: Can we keep it?

COPYRIGHT 2026 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
nick
  • Website

Related Posts

Google aims to debug California and Florida with 64 million mosquitoes

June 4, 2026

What Just Happened in California?

June 4, 2026

Todd Blanche hates ‘weaponization’ of government unless it benefits his boss

June 4, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Our Picks

Putin Says Western Sanctions are Akin to Declaration of War

January 9, 2020

Investors Jump into Commodities While Keeping Eye on Recession Risk

January 8, 2020

Marquez Explains Lack of Confidence During Qatar GP Race

January 7, 2020

There’s No Bigger Prospect in World Football Than Pedri

January 6, 2020
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

After 40 years, no one has produced a workable single-payer health care plan

Politics & Policy June 4, 2026

Billionaire progressive activist and California gubernatorial candidate Tom Steyer recently remarked: “Health care companies only…

The war powers resolution on the Iran war: What’s next?

June 4, 2026

Google aims to debug California and Florida with 64 million mosquitoes

June 4, 2026

Voters Are Sending a Message to LA's Mayor Bass

June 4, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.